I had to change from QUERTY to AZERTY literally overnight and mid-project, because I had to unexpectedly replace my computer - mine got stolen so I literally had to rush to Leclerc and buy one so I could get on with my work. (And presumably, if you're switching between both languages, it's less painful typing English on a French keyboard than the other way around.) Is that right? If so, if you've been used to touch-typing on a UK-layout keyboard for many years, how easy did you find it to unlearn your old habits?Īlso, how seriously should I take the proposals to change French keyboard layouts (Any views on whether that's likely to come to pass soon? (I can't imagine the UK government making any equivalent proposal, or that it would get anywhere, but I know things are different in France!) ![]() Spending a fair bit of time on the internet in pursuit of this has made me think about typing.įor anyone on the forum who's a touch-typist, did you switch to the French keyboard layout when you came to France? I've been assuming in the long run that that's the best thing to do to be able to type accents quickly. We're still at the planning and research stage of moving to France. Even Sholes himself continued to propose more efficient alternative layouts for the rest of his life, filing his final patent in 1889, one year before he died.Sorry if this is a common question, but I tried the search and couldn't see a post about it. Whatever the events were that led to the conception of the QWERTY layout, the design is no longer optimized for modern-day typing habits. The theory goes that by training typists on the QWERTY system, all companies that used typists trained by Remington would have to stock Remington brand typewriters, thus creating a self-sustaining system. Remington worked as both a manufacturer of the QWERTY keyboard typewriters, as well as providing training courses on how to use them. ![]() The Morse receiver needs to be as fast at typing as the Morse sender, so it would be counterintuitive to intentionally slow typing down.Īnother parallel theory surrounding the design suggests that it was Remington’s involvement with production that standardized the format. In direct opposition to the common belief, the Morse code idea suggests its function was to speed up typing by placing similar Morse-coded letters next to each other, increasing typing reaction time once the writer works out the Morse character. Thus S ought to be placed near by both Z and E on the keyboard for Morse receivers to type them quickly,” the paper details. Sometimes Morse receivers in United States cannot determine whether Z or SE is applicable, especially in the first letter(s) of a word, before they receive following letters. ’ which is often confused with the digram SE, more frequently-used than Z.The paper claims the formatting of the keyboard was actually created accidentally while trying to make typing faster and more efficient for those translating from Morse code. A 2011 paper aiming to disprove the use of the QWERTY format to slow down typing details the prehistory of the design. The slowing of the operator theory is, however, speculatory, and the true origins of the QWERTY keyboard are still debated. ![]() There are, however, two keys that break this rule – E and R is the second most common character combination, and they’re famously right next to each other in the QWERTY layout. On QWERTY keyboards, TH, ON, AN, CH, and IE all sit a good space apart, minimising the chances of the keys getting stuck by slowing down the typing process.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |